Diminishing Marginal Utility: Evaluating the Long-Term Value of Hiring Executives

By

As a small business owner or startup founder, you understand the importance of hiring the right people for your organization. It’s what enables you to grow, succeed, and ultimately achieve your goals. Yet, hiring can also be a challenging and costly process, particularly when it comes to hiring executives. Hiring your leadership team is a crucial decision that can catapult your organization's success, but can also burn through your runway.

The impact provided by these executives can also start to diminish over time, making it difficult to determine whether hiring them long-term is worth the investment (salary, benefits, equity, bonus). In this post, we’ll explore what diminishing marginal utility is, how it applies to hiring executives, and alternative ways to consider executive hiring.

What is Diminishing Marginal Utility?
Understanding the concept of diminishing marginal utility is necessary to evaluate the long-term value of hiring new executives. At its most basic level, it's an economic theory that states as one continues to consume a resource, the benefits realized from each additional unit of the resource will decrease after a certain point. In other words, the more you have of a something, the less valuable each additional unit becomes.

How does Diminishing Marginal Utility apply to executive hiring?
When it comes to hiring executives, diminishing marginal utility can play a significant role in the long-term value of the hire. For example, when a new executive is brought in, they bring fresh ideas, a different leadership style, and a new strategic vision. These executives can be extremely valuable in building new processes, programs, and deliverables, which can provide a significant "boost" to the business. However, once the goals are accomplished, businesses might find themselves with executives who are in "maintenance mode", overseeing what was built, and being leveraged in more of an advisory capacity. So it begs the question, has their "utility" or "value" been fulfilled...and is there a long term benefit to having them onboard full-time or permanently.

Alternative Options
One way to address this issue is by establishing the role of new executives as Fractional in nature. Bring in the executive as an embedded member of the team, working just as they would if they were a full-time employee (creating strategy, designing frameworks, re-invigorating teams, establishing programs, etc.) and once the goals are accomplished, they become your "as-needed" ongoing Fractional partner. This reduces the full-time overhead and gives a company ongoing access to senior expertise at a fraction of the cost.

Another possibility to fully leverage the value of your executives is by reutilizing their skills in different departments. For instance, if a new executive is hired to launch a specific program or product, after it has been launched, they could be reassigned to other departments that require their expertise.

However, some find full-time executive hiring to be the best model for their business. If this is the case, you may still consider a Fractional Executive as an interim solution while you run your search for a full-time hire. Executive searches can take anywhere from 6-12 months to hire, so engaging a Fractional Executive in an interim capacity can help keep your business function moving forward.

Conclusion
Overall, evaluating the long-term value of hiring new executives requires an assessment of the concept of diminishing marginal utility. It is essential to recognize the point at which their value starts to diminish and find ways to reutilize their skills either in different departments or in fractional roles. By doing so, businesses and startups can continue to utilize their expertise in a more cost-effective and efficient way!


If you're considering hiring an executive, Talent Refinery, is a fractional firm curating connections between executive members and companies looking for interim or fractional support. Reach out if you'd like to meet our Fractional team!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fractional vs Consultant

By
Image
Now that "fractional" is more popular and in the news, it is important to understand what the difference between that and consulting is. I was recently part of an Operator's Guild panel on just this topic, and as part of our presentation deck, created the below table to highlight the differences between all the types of non-traditional leadership roles: To put it simply, there is no difference between a fractional CXO and their full-time counterpart except that the fractional will be part-time and therefore have other work, whether other fractional or consulting work. I personally do a combination of fractional COO work and workflow consulting. And fractional is always a leadership role, although not necessarily executive level, and needs to be synonymous with that.  Another way to look at the difference between fractionals and consultants is through two more lenses: what are they hired for and what their focus has to be. Consultants are hired for their skills; they may
Read more

A Cost Comparison: Fractional Leaders vs. Full-Time Execs

By
Most organizations understand the value of having a leader in an executive role to guide their business, but it's not always financially feasible, there may not always be a full time need, or some struggle to find the right person. As a result, fractional leadership has become increasingly popular as an alternative means to leveraging executive level talent.  As a reminder from our last  post , the benefits of hiring a fractional are the flexibility it offers in terms of time commitment and the ability to access talented leaders at a fraction of the cost. Additionally, working with fractionals does not require businesses to make significant investments in infrastructure or resources—the professional provides all necessary tools and resources themselves. Since this is an emerging and growing concept, I was eager to explore the cost of a FTE (full-time employee) compensation plan, in comparisons to fractional monthly retainers. The data is eye opening to say the least!  Accor
Read more

Is Going Fractional Right for You?

By
If you've read any of my previous posts either here or on LinkedIn, you know that I believe fractional is a win-win: employers get leaders who can help them scale and optimize, despite not being able to afford that level of talent full-time and leaders can get more flexibility and control over their time and careers, as well as diversify and keep themselves challenged and growing But does that mean that every leader should quit their full-time job and go fractional? No. Like everything in life, there are downsides to going fractional, and I thought it only fair to spell out the three main challenges so that anyone considering going fractional understands both the pros and cons before making that decision. Leads As someone who was a fractional COO for years before "fractional" was a thing, and is newly back to this world, the biggest challenge of being fractional is finding the work. This is a challenge I face and that 98% of the fractionals I speak with—both inside and ou
Read more